WordWorkers

Saturday, April 01, 2006

Bible and Science - The Human Body

"I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.” - Psalm 19:1-2

The mysteries of the universe pale in comparison to the intricate complexity that is God’s greatest creation: the human body. Scientists are still trying to figure out how it works. It seems that every week new discoveries about the body are made that beg to be explained. Let’s look at some examples of discoveries in the past.

What is this red liquid that courses through our bodies? Down through the ages many scientists and doctors have believed that blood was bad. Up until 120 years ago sick people were "bled" to try to heal them. They would cut a sick person and let them bleed in the hope that the sickness would be washed out of the body along with all that useless “goo”! Needless to say, many people, including George Washington our first president, died because of this belief.

But what does the Bible say about blood? Blood is treated very specially in the Old Testament. In fact, Leviticus 17:11 says “For the life of a creature is in the blood…” That was written 3,200 years ago! In fact, today we know that blood is the source of life. Blood replenishes our oxygen and removes carbon dioxide. It distributes essential nutrients to cells and carries away metabolic waste materials for disposal. Blood recognizes antigens (foreign substances) and produces antibodies (immune defense mechanisms). Without blood we die. If only doctors would have listened!

In fact blood is so vital to the human body that it carries an element called prothrombin to clot in case you get cut and blood starts escaping the body. Isn’t it amazing that blood carries it’s own protection? Now check this out:

In Genesis 17:12, God commands baby boys to be circumcised: “For the generations to come every male among you who is eight days old must be circumcised.” We won’t get into the reasons for circumcision here, but the interesting thing to note is that God says it should be done on the 8th day? Why? Read carefully, this will blow your mind. The eighth day is the only day in the entire life of a human that the blood clotting element prothrombin is above 100%. There is never a better day in the life of a person to bleed! Wow! Does God know us or what?!!!

One thing that science has discovered since the invention of the powerful microscope, is microscopic disease. Anton van Leeuwenhoek of Holland (1632-1723) was the first to see and describe bacteria and other microscopic organisms. Before this, doctors did not know about microscopic disease and so did not wash their hands. Even after this discovery was made doctors still washed their hands in a basin of water. This caused the death of thousands of people.

You can read in the Encyclopedia Britannica that in 1845, a young doctor in Vienna named Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis was horrified at the terrible death rate of women who were dying after giving birth in hospitals. As many as 30% of those giving birth died. Dr. Ignaz noted that doctors would examine the bodies of those who had died, then, without washing their hands, go straight to the next wards and examine expectant mothers. This was their normal practice, because the presence of microscopic diseases was unknown. Doctor Semmelweis insisted that doctors wash their hands before examinations, and the death rate immediately dropped down to 2%. Today doctors must wash their hands under running water.

In Leviticus 15:13, God commands that a man who wants to be clean should wash in running water. The text reads: “he shall then wash his clothes and bathe his body in running water and will become clean”. How could the writers of the Bible know about microscopic disease 3,000 years before modern science? God truly knows us because he created everything - from the biggest supernova in space to the smallest living creature. This also tells us that God loves us. His commands might seem to be silly for thousands of years, but now we know why he gives them. He wants to protect us! What a God we have!

Myth Busters - The Jesus Hippie Look


Artists throughout history have painted Jesus with long hair. An artist’s rendering today is likely to make Jesus look very much like a 60’s hippie! This image seems to have permeated our culture. However, is this really how Jesus looked? The earliest paintings of Jesus in the Roman Catacombs have Him with short hair and no beard. The first image of Christ with a beard and long hair is dated in the 4th century. Scholars say that all previous depictions have Jesus without a beard or long hair. In fact, there are many reasons to believe that Jesus did not, in fact, have long hair.

First of all, short hair was the standard of the day. At the time Jesus lived, it was the accepted and general custom to have short hair. You can find many busts and statues of famous Greeks and Romans of Christ's time. In every case, the men are portrayed with short hair similar to what we find today. It was the emperor who set the mode of dress and appearance and every single statue of an emperor has short hair.

Not only the Greeks and Romans wore short hair, but the Jews also believed that long hair was wrong, especially for priests. In the Talmud it is stated that priests must cut their hair every 30 days. (Sanhedrin 22b) This tradition came from the Bible’s command to priests in Temple duty not to let their hair grow long. (Ezekiel 44:20) In addition to this, a frieze on the Arch of Titus in Rome, erected after Jerusalem was captured in AD 70, shows Jewish men with short hair.

We see that Jesus was no different because on several occasions He was able to blend into the crowd to escape those who wanted to kill Him. (Luke 4:30) That means that He looked like other Jewish men of the time. In addition, Judas had to come up and kiss Jesus (Luke 22:47) in order to show the guards who He was. Does that not mean that He looked very similar to His disciples?

I believe the origin of this myth is in a confusion of two words: Nazarite and Nazarene. Jesus was not a Nazarite (a person making a specific vow to God according to Numbers 6:2-6), rather he was thought to be a Nazarene (a person from Nazareth). The similarity between these words has caused many to be confused. A Nazarite could not drink wine, Jesus did (Matthew 11:19), could not touch a dead body, Jesus did (Matthew 9:25), and could not cut his hair. Jesus was clearly not a Nazarite, so he would not have followed the command (to Nazarites only) not to cut his hair. In addition, a Nazarite was usually only under the vow for a specific amount of time and was to shave his head after the vow was over. (Numbers 6:18)

Going a step farther, some modern artists have painted Jesus being blond with blue eyes! The evidence against long hair together with just a little common sense should be enough to prove this is a lie… It is very sad to think of how many people have rejected Jesus as the “White Man’s God”. Would they have listened if they knew his skin color was more like their own?

It is highly improbably that Jesus wore his hair long. There is no way it can be absolutely proven one way or the other, but the facts lead us in one clear direction: Jesus wore his hair short. The long-haired, hippie look is a myth! Let’s leave the long-haired, hippie look to the Greateful Dead.

Mini-Biography - William Wilberforce (1759-1833)

It was a warm night on an island of the West Indies. The year was 1833. On the top of a hill overlooking the ocean, a group of slaves rose to their feet and eagerly looked towards the east. Surely the sun had never been awaited more expectantly! With the first rays of the sun, these men, and millions of others would be free! They climbed the hill as slaves and now …

“Wooooooooo-hooooooooo!”

The history of how slavery was abolished is not complete without the story of William Wilberforce, generally considered to be the most influential individual in the fight against this abomination.

Early Life

William Wilberforce was born in 1759 to a wealthy, English family. He had many advantages in life, but not everything was easy for William. He was never very strong physically and battled with serious health problems all of his life. His early life was also shaped by sorrow with the death of his father.

During the time that William was a teenager, English traders raided the African coast on the Gulf of Guinea, capturing between 35 and 50 thousand Africans a year to be shipped across the Atlantic and sold into slavery. It was such a profitable business that many powerful people had become dependent upon it. One publicist for the West Indies trade wrote, "The impossibility of doing without slaves in the West Indies will always prevent this traffic being dropped. The necessity, the absolute necessity, then, of carrying it on, must, since there is no other, be its excuse."

In 1776 William went to St. John's College in Cambridge, where he played the part of a spoiled, rich kid. He never studied very hard and gave himself to pursuing his own enjoyment. It was here that he became lifelong friends with William Pitt, the future Prime Minister of England.

After university, William decided to go into politics and ran for a seat in the House of Commons. He won the election and became a member of parliament for Yorkshire. This, however, was not for any righteous motive. He later admitted, "The first years in Parliament I did nothing—nothing to any purpose. My own distinction was my darling object."

Conversion and Vision

In 1784 Willian and a friend read a book together called “The Rise and Progress of Religion in the Soul”. Soon they began studying the Greek New Testament and gradually William saw that total commitment to Christ was needed. He realized he wasn’t a Christian and struggled in anguish for several months. Gradually he yielded his will and became a true Christian. He knew that his new commitment might cost him friends and influence but he was determined to stand up for what he now believed.

After his conversion, William almost decided to get out of politics but was persuaded by many friends to remain and use his power and influence for good. One of these friends was John Newton, a former slave trader and still famous for writing “Amazing Grace”. He, Pitt and several others believed that William could lead the cause against the slave trade. William, however, at first was not convinced; he said: "I feel the great importance of the subject and I think myself unequal to the task allotted to me." However, after much thought and prayer, William decided to give it his all. "My walk is a public one," he wrote in his diary. "My business is in the world, and I must mix in the assemblies of men or quit the post which Providence seems to have assigned me."

The Long Battle

William Wilberforce now had a life mission. He wrote in his diary: "God Almighty has set before me two great objects, the suppression of the Slave Trade and the Reformation of Manners." From this moment on, William dedicated his life to reforming the morals of society and ending the slave trade. He gave away one fourth of his annual income to the poor. He fought on behalf of chimney sweeps, single mothers, Sunday schools, orphans, and juvenile delinquents. He helped found groups like the Society for Bettering the Cause of the Poor, the Church Missionary Society, the British and Foreign Bible Society, and the Antislavery Society. But his whole life was dedicated to one main purpose – the abolition of slavery.

On 12 May 1789, Wilberforce made his first speech against the slave trade before the House of Commons. The speech was praised in the newspapers as being one of the most eloquent ever to have been heard in the house. The Star reported that “the gallery of the House of Commons on Tuesday was crowded with Liverpool Merchants; who hung their heads in sorrow - for the African occupation of bolts and chains is no more.” William himself was optimistic and said he had “no doubt” of his chances of quick success.

But the initial optimism was wrong; the battle would be long. Many of the politicians of the time were in favor of slavery and so began to use delaying tactics to fight against Wilberforce. People would debate and form commissions to investigate and hold hearings, request and hear information, but nothing really happened. By the end of the political year, the whole matter was adjurned till the next year. Still, Wilberforce didn’t lose his optimism.

By the end of the first year, he had managed to have 12 resolutions against the slave trade introduced to the house, only to be outmaneuvered on fine legal points. Other bills introduced by Wilberforce were defeated in 1791, 1792, 1793, 1797, 1798, 1799, 1804, and 1805. All these bills were blocked by bribery, intimidation, vested interests, parliamentary filibustering, entrenched bigotry, international politics, slave rebellions, his ongoing physical problems, and political fear.

When Wilberforce showed that he would not let the issue die, pro-slavery forces targeted him personally and even physically assaulted him! He was vilified so fiercely, that one friend feared that one day he would read about William being "broiled by Indian planters, barbecued by African merchants, and eaten by Guinea captains." To add to the external attacks, Wilberforce suffered poor health all his life, sometimes keeping him bedridden for weeks. During one such time, he wrote, "I am still a close prisoner, wholly unequal even to such a little business as I am now engaged in: add to which my eyes are so bad that I can [barely] see how to direct my pen." Many of his companions abandoned him and gave up the fight, but Wilberforce continued steadfast – confident of ultimate success.

Finally, on 23 February 1807, Parliament voted overwhelmingly in favor of abolition of the slave trade. During the debate an emotional tribute was given to Wilberforce. It is written than "Wilberforce was overcome by the power [the] concluding passages, and sat with his head on his hands, tears streaming down his face. As [the reader] reached his final sentences the House broke into one of those scenes that it reserves for great occasions. Members stood and cheered him tumultuously." Scenes like this are very rare in the House of Commons, where applause is forbidden. Wilberforce later wrote “I was myself so completely overpowered by my feelings that I was insensible to all that was passing around me”.

This was the beginning of the ultimate victory. The Slave Trade was abolished from the whole British Empire, and William turned his attention to the complete emancipation of all slaves. Though he was forced to retire from Parliament due to his health, others continued where he had begun and the final bill abolishing slavery was read on July 26, 1833. Wilberforce heard the bill on his dying bed and said “Thank God that I have lived to witness a day in which England is willing to give twenty million sterling for the Abolition of Slavery”. Three days later, on 29 July 1833, he died.

Conclusion

What gave this man the power to continue amidst the enormous opposition? There were two things that stand out. First was William’s personal faith in God and His people. His biographer said that “one man's faith could mobilise a whole nation's conscience.” William once wrote: "The best hope for Britain is not in her fleet and armies, not so much in the wisdom of her rulers, but in the spirit of her people and in the persuasion that she still contains many who, in a degenerate age, love and obey the Gospel of Christ".

Secondly, William knew that he wasn’t able to do it alone; he had friends that encouraged and inspired him to continue. He was a prominent member of a group of influential Christians devoted to ending slavery and changing society for the better. They lived in Clapham and people called them the “Clapham Sect”. By banding together, these Christians were able to encourage each other and fight on. Truly, as the Bible says, “One can chase a thousand. Two can put to flight ten thousand.” As John Wesley, another of his friends, lay dying, he wrote him a letter that sums up William Wilberforce’s life secret:

“Unless God has raised you up for this very thing, you will be worn out by the opposition of men and devils. But if God be for you, who can be against you? Are all of them together stronger than God? O be not weary of well doing! Go on, in the name of God and in the power of his might, till even American slavery (the vilest that ever saw the sun) shall vanish away before it ... That he who has guided you from youth up may continue to strengthen you in this and all things, is my prayer.”

Internet Special - Amazing Grace, the Movie

Coming to Theaters Spring 2007

Amazing Grace is based on the true story of William Wilberforce, a British statesman and reformer from the early part of the 19th century. This feature film will chronicle his extraordinary contributions to the world, primarily his 20-year fight to abolish the British slave trade, which he won in 1807. He was also instrumental in passing legislation to abolish slavery in the British colonies, a victory he won just three days before his death in 1833.

The movie from Walden Media (www.waldenmedia.com) will be directed by Michael Apted and will star Ioan Gruffudd as William Wilberforce and Albert Finney as John Newton.

Dear WordWorkers - Hard Soil

Dear WordWorkers,

I have a co-worker that just started at my job and we recently had lunch. She expressed to me how she doesn’t feel a need in her life to seek or soul search right now. She believes she is very happy with her life. I think I need advice on how much I should invest in this friendship. Please help.

You might be thinking too much. Just be you. Be normal everyday and continue to live for Jesus. Over time your co-worker will see your life; she will see the life of a Christian. You never know what God has planned, but have faith that God will use your life to impact hers. Continue to pray for her and continue to be the best you can be for God.

Sincerely,

WordWorkers

To submit a question to the “Dear WordWorkers” column, please send an email to wordworkers@gmail.com.

Bible & History - Four World Empires

As we examine the Bible in the light of history, we will see how powerfully our God has worked in times past. He orchestrates every detail and carefully lays out his purposes. As for us, only when thousands of years have gone by do we begin to see his plan.

Let’s take a look at one of the grandest prophecies ever made. In Daniel 2:31-45 four empires that would rule the world are described symbolically. The fourth of these empires would not be replaced by another, but rather God would set up His own Kingdom at that time.

In the story of the prophecy, Nebuchadnezzar dreamed of a statue with a head of gold, chest and arms of silver, belly and thighs of bronze, legs of iron and feet partly iron and partly clay. Daniel explained that each part of the statue represented a kingdom that would rule the earth. Babylon was the first kingdom, the Head of Gold. Historically Nebuchadnezzar's Babylon lasted from 606 to 539 B.C. and was one of the most incredible kingdoms ever to reign on earth. This was the kingdom that was in power when this prophecy was given.
The future to Daniel and Nebuchadnezzar is ancient history to us. We know that Medo-Persia was the second kingdom, the chest and arms of silver, which lasted from 539 to 360 B.C. This kingdom was made up of two peoples, the Medes and the Persians as represented by the two arms. It was very powerful and conquered even more land than the Babylonian Empire had, but because it was made up of two nations it never was as unified as Babylon had been.

Greece was the third kingdom, the belly and thighs of bronze. Just as bronze is much stronger than gold and silver, so Alexander the Great's army was much stronger than the previous kingdoms. The Greek empire however, which began in 360 B.C. and lasted for several hundred years, never had the splendor of the previous kingdoms.

Rome was the fourth and last kingdom, the legs of iron and feet partly iron and partly clay. The Roman empire was officially founded in 27 B.C. and lasted until about 397 A.D. The Roman empire, as symbolized by the two legs, was split into two empires: The Western Roman empire centered in Rome and the Byzantine empire centered in Constantinople (Istanbul, Turkey). Both of these empires faded away and were not replaced by another empire but were split up into nations that have never been able to unite together into one. During the time of this last kingdom was when the Kingdom of Heaven would be set up. We see that this was fulfilled, for during the Roman empire Jesus came to earth and established His kingdom!

The scope and grandeur of this prophecy is truly breathtaking. It shows that God not only deals with individuals, groups, cities and nations, but with the world as a whole. Everything is truly in His hands. As it says in Daniel 2:20-21, " Wisdom and power are his. He changes times and seasons; he sets up kings and deposes them." Our God is in control! Understanding this should give us confidence to trust Him more fully in our own, tiny lives.

Horror-Scopes - Always Verify!

There is so much that God wants to tell us through his Word, but only sometimes do we understand what He is saying right away. At times we have to read it over and over or study it before we can understand it. Often we cannot understand what we read until we obey it. And sometimes, more often than we know, we cannot really understand things unless the Spirit speaks to our spirit.

However, not understanding what God says is sometimes our own fault. We read a passage of Scripture and skip over it because we think we already know (maybe somebody told us) what it means! When we do this, we are in danger of not hearing God's Word spoken to us!

Let's look at an example that many readers may be familiar with. In Matthew 11:12 it says: "From the days of John the Baptist until now, the kingdom of heaven has been forcefully advancing, and forceful men lay hold of it." Many people have taken this to mean that if we want to advance the kingdom of heaven, we must be "forceful". In fact, this scripture has been used to correct Christians who's character was not forceful or powerful enough in their dealings with others.

Is this really what Jesus is saying?

If we look at the verse in translations other than the NIV, we find that most of the more accurate ones use the word "violent" instead of forceful. Looking at word commentaries and lexicons, we find that the Greek word is used for the invasion of a country, or warriors overrunning a fortress! This clearly means more than a forceful character.

What kind of character did Jesus have? We don't have to go too far to find out! In verse 29 of the same chapter, we read: "Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls." We have examples where Jesus was forceful and very bold, but we are told many times that Jesus' overall attitude was one of absolute humility and meekness. How could we believe that Jesus would tell us to be something other than what he was?

In a parallel verse, Luke 16:16 Jesus says: "The Law and the Prophets were proclaimed until John. Since that time, the good news of the kingdom of God is being preached, and everyone is forcing his way into it." Now we can see that Jesus is speaking of the attitude that is essential to entering the kingdom of God! We can see other verses where the same truth is taught, like in Luke 13:24: "Make every effort to enter through the narrow door, because many, I tell you, will try to enter and will not be able to." The attitude necessary to become a Christian is that of a soldier fighting his way into a well-guarded fort. There is no easy way to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. It is a battle! If we don't make every effort, we risk never making it in!

So we learn that what Jesus is saying in Matthew 11:12 has been sometimes overlooked because of a misunderstanding of what was being read! We’ll probably never know where it started, but I think we can guess how this error made its way through so many Christians. We weren't verifying what we were told!

A misunderstanding like this doesn't seem to be so serious, but, could anything be more serious? Do we want to believe things to be God's words, when in fact, they are not?

In the next issue, let's look at Philemon 1:6 and what "sharing your faith" means. If you can figure it out, please email your thoughts to wordworkers@gmail.com. Your answer may get printed! Until then, don't forget to verify!

Lessons from the Remnant - Haunted by the Past


In March (or sometimes in April) one of my favorite Biblical holidays occurs. It is Purim: the celebration of how G-d spared his people in the book of Esther. As many of us know, Esther was a queen who showed great courage in the face of danger. Yet there are many deeper truths this book reveals that often go unnoticed, one of which we will focus on in this article. Before we start, I highly encourage you to read the book of Esther whether you are familiar with the story or not.

The story of Esther and her cousin Mordecai is inspiring. We see how Mordecai raised his orphaned cousin as his own daughter. His heart is as noble and loving a heart as you will find in the scriptures. We see how Esther obeyed and trusted G-d and her cousin in the face of fear. Her obedience and trust is an example we should all hope to follow.

But one of the most overlooked parts of the story is Haman. We read how through his arrogance, Haman plotted to kill every last Jew alive. At first reading you might think this is a huge over-reaction to Mordecai not showing the proper respect in Haman’s mind. So why would Haman hate so deeply, so quickly? He didn’t just want to punish Mordecai. He desired total annihilation of Mordecai’s people! The key to this question is found in Esther 3:1, “… Haman son of Hammedatha, the Agagite…” You see, Haman was an Agagite, and the Agagites were descendents of King Agag. Who is King Agag and how does this explain why Haman hated the Jews?

For this answer we must go back to the time of the reign of Saul, Israel’s first king. In 1st Samuel 15:3, G-d sent Samuel to King Saul with a message, “…Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women …” Saul was to kill and destroy everything that moved, according to the command of the L-rd. Saul failed to do this. Instead, he destroyed what was weak but took captive King Agag and kept him alive. (1st Samuel 15:8) Later on, Samuel kills King Agag, but the damage had been done.

So you see, Haman is a descendent of King Agag. He must have grown up with all the stories of how the Jews killed their people and how the Agagites were all that were left of the once proud Amalekites. No wonder he hated Mordecai and all the Jews!

The hidden lesson is how Saul’s sin nearly destroyed all the Jews generations later in the time of Esther. Think about what Esther and the Jews went through because of Saul’s sin! Esther had to be torn away from her cousin, Mordecai, the only family she had left. She had to live in the palace away from her people and family for years while having to hide who she was. She then had to win the Kings’ favor and risk her own life to save her people. These very Jews would never have needed to be saved if Saul listened to G-d, because Haman would never have been born!

In conclusion, let us look at our own lives and the sin we have “kinda” dealt with, but not completely destroyed. Do we realize how our arrogance, disobedience, and pride can hurt our family and friends in the future or do we rather worry about looking good in their eyes? Let us look earnestly to see if we have left open the door to sin from our past. As David says in Psalm 139:23-24, “Search me, O God, and know my heart; test me and know my anxious thoughts. See if there is any offensive way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting.”

Digging Deeper - Translation vs. Transliteration

Despite what many of us would like to believe, the Bible was not written in the contemporary English of the New International Version. There is much that is different from the times and cultures in which the Bible was written as compared to our time and culture. We must understand how the Word of God, which was written in ancient Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, came to us who speak 21st Century English.

The Bibles that we read today use two methods of bringing the Word out of the original languages to our contemporary English. The first method is translation, which conveys the content of one language into another using word-for-word, phrase-for-phrase, or thought-for-thought replacement. The following is an example of translation: There is a song sung in both Spanish and English called “La Via Dolorosa.” One line of this song says, “Down the ‘Via Dolorosa,’ the way of suffering.” In this one line, the songwriter translates “via” (way) and “dolorosa” (painful) directly into a phrase that makes sense in English, i.e. “the way of suffering.” In the same way, the scholars who have given us the modern English Bible have analyzed the original languages and rendered them in a way that makes sense to us.

The other technique is transliteration, which is the taking of a word from foreign language and rendering it without translating it. For an example lets look at the words: “Caesar” and “Czar.” “Caesar” was the name of the first Roman emperor (Julius Caesar) and later became the name of the office of all the emperors who followed him. This word was adapted through transliteration many centuries ago in the Russian language to “царь” which was the office of the royal head of state in Russia. In English, we would typically look at a word like “царь” and simply translate it to “king.” However, in order to denote the national origin of the Russian king and the cultural meaning associated with it, we have transliterated this word in English to “czar.”

For our purposes, in the New Testament, let’s focus on 3 particular words that are transliterated from Greek to English: “apostle” (from the Greek “απόστολος”), “baptism” (from the Greek “βάπτισμα”) , and “Christ” (from the Greek “Χριστός”).

Just as the term “czar” has limited use and meaning outside of Russian history, the words “apostle,” “baptism,” and “Christ” are rarely, if ever, used outside of religious context. In fact would we even understand what these words actually mean outside church? For example, we know that there were 12 apostles of Christ, but what exactly is an apostle? If we were to translate this word into English, it would simply be “messenger.” With this knowledge, we have a better understanding of what the Bible truly means in Luke 6:13: “…he called his disciples to him and chose twelve of them, whom he also designated apostles”. Here Jesus called his followers to him and designated 12 of them to be His special “messengers”. When we look at the transliterated word “apostle” we may get the sense that Jesus was mystically transforming these men into “super-disciples.” The meaning of the word “apostle” translated rather than transliterated is similar to a coach calling a team together and appointing some members of the team as captains. The 12 apostles were the first spiritual captains of the original church!

“Baptism” is another term that is used frequently but understood incompletely. Again, without translating “baptism” from Greek to English, we might consider the act of baptism as an almost ethereal event in which a person is magically transformed from a sinner to a saint. However, let’s translate “baptism” from Greek: when doing so, “baptism” is “immersion.” Now let’s apply the translation to the following command from Matthew 28:19: “Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, immersing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”

Dunking someone in the water, even in the name of Jesus, does not necessarily immerse that person in the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit! When translated, “baptism” describes not only the act of water immersion but the immersion of one’s life in God. If Christians today were to convey the translated meaning of baptism to their non-Christians friends, perhaps we would see many more sincere conversions to Christ.

The last of the transliterated words in this study is surely the most important: “Christ.” Some people may erroneously think that “Christ” was Jesus’ last name, but with a little attention to detail we understand that this was the authoritative title conferred upon him by God. The term Christ, “Χριστός” in Greek, was actually a Hebrew to Greek translation of a Hebrew word which we know in English as “messiah.” This term means “anointed one.” Since there isn’t much anointing going on these days, we lose even more meaning when we only transliterate “Christ” and don’t translate it. For the purpose of this study, let’s recognize that to “anoint” means to confer authority upon someone. To fully understand it, we might make the analogy that every four years in America we vote for President and the winner is the “anointed” leader of our nation. Now consider the following Scripture from Matthew 16:16 with “Christ” translated rather than transliterated: “Simon Peter answered, ‘You are the anointed one, the Son of the living God.’" Peter recognized that Jesus was the anointed one, the chosen one, the one upon whom God had conferred his authority. The term “Christ” had tangible meaning to Peter in that Jesus demonstrated the teaching, actions and lifestyle of one chosen by God to lead people to salvation.

In summary, it will be of great value to us to understand the words used in our Bible to ensure that we fully grasp the content and context. Hopefully, the next time you run across a transliterated word in your Bible you will be inspired to dig deeper in order to translate it in a meaningful way!

Book Review - Captivating

In “Wild at Heart” John Eldredge describes why God made men the way He did. Mr. Eldredge argues that God designed a man with three basic longings: a battle to fight, an adventure to live, and a beauty to rescue. God did this so that through these longings every man would be driven somehow to fulfill God’s plan for His creation. After the book became wildly successful, it became evident that there was a need for some revelation on the better half of humanity. “Captivating” finally hit bookstores four years later.

It seems that women have some longings of their own, and, wouldn’t you know it, they are different than those of men! According to Stasi and John, a woman also has three basic longings: to unveil beauty, to be romanced, and to be part of a great adventure. The authors reveal that many issues women deal with stem from these three, simple desires.

Here are some of the things I have learned from this book:

To Unveil Beauty

Sadly, most women do not feel that they are beautiful, inside or outside. They feel they are too much and not enough at the same time. Deep inside them burns a question. “Am I lovely?” Too often they believe the lies of Satan and this world and they answer the question internally with a spirit-crushing “NO”.

If only they could see their beauty the way God does! When God made the world and He and Adam were hangin’ out there had to be a point where they looked around and then looked at each other and said, “something’s missing.” It wasn’t until a woman showed up on the scene that the beauty of God’s creation found completeness. Not just because women are physically beautiful, but because it is through their spirit and heart that we appreciate the very nature of beauty.

To Be Romanced

Naturally, each longing affects the other. When a woman does not see her beauty the way God does, she can search for other ways to validate her beauty, ways that God did not intend. The question, “Am I lovely?” should be posed to the Creator, but instead it is presented to the creation: men. And, let’s be honest, men have not always been a shining example of appreciation and selflessness.

Even though a woman’s longing to be romanced is God-given, it becomes influenced and often distorted by the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the men in her life. It is not that a woman shouldn’t want to be romanced by a man, but that God, her true and eternal love, has already done it. It is from that place of ultimate self-worth that she can allow herself to be romanced by a man without insecurity or fear.

To Be Part of a Great Adventure

Most stories about adventure center around men: great battles, epic journeys, rights of passage, political struggles and the like. This socially accepted norm could easily make a woman feel resigned to an insignificant role in the course of human events. Nothing could be further from God’s intention.

When you take a closer look at the stories in history, there is a striking significance in the role of women. Not only have they used their God-given fierceness to influence the outcome of many events but they have inspired the beginnings as well. What, after all, are men fighting for? Where do they learn the values that lead them to strive and struggle? Isn’t it from their mothers, their wives, their daughters…? God designed women to be the emotional and relational core of mankind. Women are God’s way of saying that the heart matters, that relationships matter. When a woman lives her role instead of forcing it, then she is truly fulfilling God’s design for her life.

Conclusion

Why does understanding all of this matter? This book helps men to understand the opposite sex a bit better. It is also crucially important because it answers some key questions about God’s design for women and men. Our God-given design was intended to support our fundamental purposes in life.

I have to say though, one of the lessons I didn’t expect to learn was one of responsibility. In a particularly disturbing chapter, the authors expose the fastidious hatred that Satan has for women. The physical, psychological, political and sexual abuse of women throughout history reveals how Satan has focused much of his assault toward them. He must have realized as early as Eden that if he attacks a woman, he will very likely bring a man down in the process. That is where man’s responsibility comes in. As men, one of our longings is for a beauty to rescue. If we don’t embrace our role, then it will not only hurt the women in our lives, but ourselves as well.

I hope that those women who haven’t read the book will be inspired to read it and embrace God’s design for your life. And for the men, I believe you need to read this book because the women in our lives deserve to be understood, appreciated, defended, and yes, sometimes rescued … even if that means from our own ignorance.